architect man working with blueprints engineer inspection workplace architectural plan sketch 2 blog

Navigating seismic standards: simplifying workplace safety

10 September 2023, by Paul Mautz

A better understanding by tenants of the seismic performance of commercial buildings continues to gain momentum.

The demand for ‘safe’ workplaces remains a high priority, as clients seek reassurance that their space is fit for purpose and meets acceptable seismic standards, as measured against the New Building Standard (NBS). 

However, for many people, understanding the jargon and percentage ratings can be challenging. So here’s a simplified breakdown for clarity:

Earthquake ratings – what do they really indicate?

The % NBS rating is a measure of a building’s seismic performance when compared to the seismic performance of a similar new building constructed under current standards and codes. It is calculated as part of a seismic assessment.

However, the %NBS rating does not assess compliance with the current Building Code. A 100% rating does not guarantee that all Code requirements are fulfilled. It merely indicates how the building should perform to meet the minimum seismic performance objectives of the Code in terms of protecting people. 

The %NBS rating also does not assess a building’s ability to function after an earthquake. It provides no information on the expected damage or the building’s usability post-earthquake.

The basics

A seismic rating of 50% NBS means the building should perform similarly to a 100% NBS-rated building but only under half the level of shaking, assuming all other factors are equal. In Wellington, office buildings are designed and constructed to reliably withstand earthquake shaking with a return period of one in 500 years. A building with a 50% NBS rating should withstand a one-in-100-year earthquake with a similar level of reliability (note: the scale is exponential).

The New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE) considers buildings with a rating above 67% NBS to be acceptable in terms of seismic risk.

The risks to your organisation

The following table helps understand the level of risk associated with different NBS ratings:

% NBS rating of a building 

Approx. risk to life in a building compared to a similar new building 

Indicative probability an earthquake will occur over a 12-year lease period that will theoretically cause the building to exceed its defined capacity*  

Relative risk description 

100% 

<1 

<2.5% 

Low risk 

75% 

2 times 

5% 

Low risk 

67% 

5 times 

6% 

Medium risk 

50% 

7 times 

12% 

Medium risk 

34% 

10 times 

22% 

High risk 

<20% 

More than 25 times 

>45% 

Very high risk 

 

Source: Beca

* This is several orders of magnitude higher than the fatality risk

 

The table demonstrates that occupying a building rated at 50% NBS (considered medium risk) carries approximately a 12% chance over a 12-year period of experiencing earthquake shaking that could exceed the defined capacity of the building. In other words, there is statistically a 12% chance over 12 years that the building will experience severe shaking.

Although occupying such a building is around seven times riskier than a new one, it is not considered high risk relative to other options.

It is important to note that the assessed capacity of a building is not set at a level where collapse is certain. Thus, the probability of fatality resulting from collapse is even lower.

What about buildings with ratings below 34%NBS?

Buildings with earthquake ratings below 34% NBS meet one of the requirements for being considered Earthquake-Prone Buildings (EPBs) under the Building Act 2004. Ratings below 67% NBS are considered Earthquake Risk Buildings (ERBs).

New legislation now addresses earthquake-prone buildings, primarily focusing on identifying these buildings and establishing timeframes for strengthening.

Contrary to popular belief, earthquake-prone buildings can still be occupied, but safety and risk management are crucial factors. The Health and Safety in Employment Act imposes consequences if owners or occupiers fail to take practical steps to minimise hazards in the workplace. However, WorkSafe clarifies that as long as steps are actively being taken to address earthquake-prone buildings in accordance with the Building Act's requirements, the Health and Safety at Work Act will not impose a higher standard of life safety. If these risks are neglected, owners and occupiers may be in breach of the HSAW Act. Serious hazards that are easily addressable should be attended to within a reasonable timeframe.

Insights from recent earthquakes

While the statistics are informative, real-life scenarios may not always align with them.

Major earthquakes in Christchurch and Wellington in the past decade were exceptional events with different levels of building performance. Some buildings were demolished due to immediate safety concerns or because repairs were deemed uneconomical. However, many buildings were still usable without the need for repair.

Although there are no guarantees of how a building will perform in a major earthquake, the NBS rating system remains the best available tool to assist in making decisions regarding safety obligations in the workplace.

Update on what's changing

GNS have recently released an update of the National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) which forecasts across NZ the expected strength of ground shaking that will occur during an earthquake. The outputs from the model feed into the design standards for new buildings. Engineering NZ has developed a draft of potential changes to the NZ Standard (NZS1170.5:2004) used to determine the seismic loads for the design of new buildings. 

While these are yet to adopted into a new (updated) Standard, we can expect an increase in design standards at some point in the future. The implications of this is that the %NBS of existing buildings will be lowered against their current rating. MBIE will need to carefully consider what a further increase in design standards will have on the market’s view of existing building stock from a safety perspective and demand/rent implications. 

...

About the author

Knows a lot about 1970’s music. Wears a hat. In-house quiz master. Sauv Blanc and MU fan. Prefers to spend winters in Europe. Learning the guitar.

Paul has been a senior member of our team since 2004 and specialises in premises procurement and leasing. With 25+ years' experience in the commercial property sector, he's been involved with a number of large leasing transactions, representing clients in project leadership and tenant representation roles.

Other posts by this author...

21 November 2022

Wanted! An earthquake rating tool that covers all angles

“The NBS shouldn’t be the sole way for business owners and tenants to assess the risk to their people and business when signing up to a building” says TwentyTwo’s Paul Mautz.

Read more...

10 August 2022

Gaining a better understanding of seismic risk

MBIE recently issued guidance for building owners and occupiers on how to assess continued occupancy of a building with a low seismic rating – useful from a number of perspectives…First, it provides a sound framework...

Read more...

27 June 2022

The Wellington office market is short of good options. Our advice…

If you’ve started a search for good-quality space over 1000m2 in Wellington, you would have got a shock at how few good options are available.So why is this?There are a number of reasons.

Read more...

21 April 2021

Operating expenses… do you know what’s what?

If you’re leasing property, then somewhere within your rent payment will be a contribution to the building’s operating expenses or ‘opex’.

Read more...

21 September 2020

Precast concrete seismic risks: A tenant’s guide to leasing buildings with precast flooring

If you’ve been keeping up with the news on earthquakes and their effect on buildings, you would have come across much discussion on the performance of precast flooring systems.

Read more...

28 May 2020

Fix or float my rent?

While many organisations have a lot on their plates right now, sooner or later they’ll need to think about whether to relocate or stay in their existing premises when their lease expires.

Read more...

09 November 2019

Adding Value, Tackling Challenges - NZDF, Youth Development Facility

“When TwentyTwo was approached in February 2018 to assist the NZ Defence Force with developing a new facility for their Youth Development Unit (YDU) for the Wellington region in Trentham, Upper Hutt, we jumped at...

Read more...

22 April 2019

Market rental valuation – do I need one? And what am I missing?

Thinking of moving premises? Are you about to sign a new lease? Perhaps you’ve obtained a market rental valuation and what you’re being offered appears to marry up – on paper?Stop, pause and read on.

Read more...

30 April 2018

IFRS 16: The leases standard is changing - are you ready?

If you’re responsible for your company’s accounts or managing its property portfolio, you should be aware of the upcoming changes to the treatment of lease rent liabilities in the financial statements.

Read more...

06 February 2018

Does your workplace contain asbestos? Legislation changes coming into effect April 2018

The risks around asbestos being present in buildings has been a significant issue for many years.According to Worksafe, it’s a leading workplace hazard with more than 170 people dying each year from past asbestos exposure.

Read more...

03 July 2016

Incentives or inducements – weighing up the costs

I’ve recently been involved with a job that raises the question of just what constitutes an incentive or inducement in a leasing deal.

Read more...

03 February 2016

Ten into one. A colocation journey

In 2013, 10 health regulatory authorities started a journey to collocate and create a model of one organisation providing the corporate services for all 10.

Read more...

30 June 2015

The role of the tenant adviser in New Zealand

Over the last 20 years, an increasing number of New Zealand property professionals have focused their attention on providing advice specifically tailored to tenant and owner-occupiers of commercial property.

Read more...

04 June 2015

RICS Commercial Property Leasing sessions – by TwentyTwo's Paul Mautz

TwentyTwo's Associate Partner Paul Mautz MRICS FPINZ will be presenting the RICS Oceania three-hour training session covering Commercial Property Leasing.

Read more...

04 June 2015

TwentyTwo advises government in Christchurch development

TwentyTwo’s Paul Mautz acted as lead adviser for the Crown’s lease of space in the recently announced $150+ million, river-front office and apartment complex in Christchurch CBD.

Read more...