blog
10 August 2022, by Paul Mautz
MBIE recently issued guidance for building owners and occupiers on how to assess continued occupancy of a building with a low seismic rating – useful from a number of perspectives…
First, it provides a sound framework for thinking through a ‘stay or go’ decision in the complex world of seismic ratings, earthquake risks and structural weaknesses.
But more importantly, it puts into perspective some of the uncertainty that exists in the world of building science. What do I mean? When we think of engineering, we think equations, formulas and statistics that give certainty to things. We expect defined problems and calculated solutions. We seek exact answers, not generalised statements or opinions. So when it comes to working out how to keep the rate of fatalities from building failures to near zero, we rely on engineers to tell us what design equations will make that happen. Only, that’s just not possible. And the MBIE guidance tells us why.
The first clue is that there isn’t a formula, methodology or model that guarantees that no one dies when buildings get hit by seismic forces, including the National Building Standard (NBS) rating. As MBIE points out, the rating was primarily developed to work out whether a building is ‘earthquake prone’ and therefore subject to particular legislative requirements ie legislation that imposes an obligation to strengthen the building above 34% NBS within a certain timeframe. MBIE also reminds us that the rating is not a predictor of building failure in any particular earthquake, nor does a low rating mean a building is imminently dangerous. It usefulness is as ‘an indicator of seismic performance, rather than an exact prediction’.
The second clue is that we need to better understand what building structural elements – should they fail – could lead to fatalities. Because not everything does. The guidance points out that we need to be more concerned about things like columns and beams and hollow core floors than non-structural items like plant and exterior cladding as these tend to carry other (heavy) loads and can do the most damage. If these items are sound, then the risks are reduced.
MBIE also tells us that many older buildings (some defined as ‘earthquake prone’) survived a 1-in-2000-year earthquake event in Christchurch in 2011. Same with the 2016 Kaikoura earthquake (greater than a 1-in-1000-year event). If the maths applied, then these vulnerable building should have been severely damaged. But many had little or no damage. The actual does not always follow the predicted. This is not to say these building shouldn’t be strengthened (they should as they still pose a heightened risk to life safety in future quakes), but they just may be more structurally sound than our models predict. A testament to building design and construction in NZ.
MBIE also tells us that statistics bear out the fact that loss of life from building damage is extremely low, regardless of building condition. Based on statistical loss of life of one person per 40,000 of population (worst stat), then fewer than two people would be expected to die in the Wellington City CBD during a major earthquake. This low level of risk is not guaranteed of course, but the point is we can expect a lot fewer deaths and injuries than we are likely to predict from buildings themselves.
The guidance from MBIE tells us not to panic if we find out the seismic rating of our building is low (not defined, but more than likely less than 40% NBS). We can probably stay there (assuming no dangerous structural damage already exists), but we need to plan to deal with how to reduce the potential risk now and in the future. Simple works like restraining plant and equipment that can fall from height and cause injury, moving people away from more vulnerable areas, and developing an emergency response plan, are good starts. Ultimately, the building may need to be vacated (or parts of it) to allow seismic upgrade works to be completed. This needs time to in order to plan and carry out. Some upgrades can take one year or more to complete so business decant strategies also need to be worked through.
Finally, we know from experience that not all professional advice and engineering reports produce the same outcomes. Engineers are humans who make assumptions in their models based on information they acquire. Differing information leads to differing assumptions which leads to differing results. Second opinions and peer reviews are common in the engineering industry. Often, an assessment is a consensus rather than a defined output. In the same regard, MBIE reminds us we need to see the NBS rating more as a reflection of a performance range than pin-point accuracy. Hence, the NZ Society of Engineering building grading scheme – A-grade being 80% NBS or greater and B-grade being 67% to 80% NBS and C-grade being 34% to 67% NBS. These are broader categories allow the property industry to more simply understand levels of risk without the undue emphasis on a single number.
The Guidance document helps us think about seismic risk more broadly than focusing just on the NBS rating itself. When our building does have a low rating, we need to better understand why and what simple things we can do to further lower risk to occupants before taking the big decision to vacate. And once we do understand the problems with our building, we should realise that they are likely to be stronger and better designed than we give them credit for when life safety is concerned. Fatalities in NZ bear that out. Finally, there is no magic formula for saving lives – risk is a constant that we just have to live with.
Knows a lot about 1970’s music. Wears a hat. In-house quiz master. Sauv Blanc and MU fan. Prefers to spend winters in Europe. Learning the guitar.
Paul has been a senior member of our team since 2004 and specialises in premises procurement and leasing. With 25+ years' experience in the commercial property sector, he's been involved with a number of large leasing transactions, representing clients in project leadership and tenant representation roles.
10 September 2023
A better understanding by tenants of the seismic performance of commercial buildings continues to gain momentum.
Read more...
21 November 2022
“The NBS shouldn’t be the sole way for business owners and tenants to assess the risk to their people and business when signing up to a building” says TwentyTwo’s Paul Mautz.
Read more...
27 June 2022
If you’ve started a search for good-quality space over 1000m2 in Wellington, you would have got a shock at how few good options are available.So why is this?There are a number of reasons.
Read more...
21 April 2021
If you’re leasing property, then somewhere within your rent payment will be a contribution to the building’s operating expenses or ‘opex’.
Read more...
21 September 2020
If you’ve been keeping up with the news on earthquakes and their effect on buildings, you would have come across much discussion on the performance of precast flooring systems.
Read more...
28 May 2020
While many organisations have a lot on their plates right now, sooner or later they’ll need to think about whether to relocate or stay in their existing premises when their lease expires.
Read more...
09 November 2019
“When TwentyTwo was approached in February 2018 to assist the NZ Defence Force with developing a new facility for their Youth Development Unit (YDU) for the Wellington region in Trentham, Upper Hutt, we jumped at...
Read more...
22 April 2019
Thinking of moving premises? Are you about to sign a new lease? Perhaps you’ve obtained a market rental valuation and what you’re being offered appears to marry up – on paper?Stop, pause and read on.
Read more...
30 April 2018
If you’re responsible for your company’s accounts or managing its property portfolio, you should be aware of the upcoming changes to the treatment of lease rent liabilities in the financial statements.
Read more...
06 February 2018
The risks around asbestos being present in buildings has been a significant issue for many years.According to Worksafe, it’s a leading workplace hazard with more than 170 people dying each year from past asbestos exposure.
Read more...
03 July 2016
I’ve recently been involved with a job that raises the question of just what constitutes an incentive or inducement in a leasing deal.
Read more...
03 February 2016
In 2013, 10 health regulatory authorities started a journey to collocate and create a model of one organisation providing the corporate services for all 10.
Read more...
30 June 2015
Over the last 20 years, an increasing number of New Zealand property professionals have focused their attention on providing advice specifically tailored to tenant and owner-occupiers of commercial property.
Read more...
04 June 2015
TwentyTwo's Associate Partner Paul Mautz MRICS FPINZ will be presenting the RICS Oceania three-hour training session covering Commercial Property Leasing.
Read more...
04 June 2015
TwentyTwo’s Paul Mautz acted as lead adviser for the Crown’s lease of space in the recently announced $150+ million, river-front office and apartment complex in Christchurch CBD.
Read more...Contact Dean Croucher +64 27 478 9589
Email dean@twentytwo.co.nz
Wellington
Historic House, 22 The Terrace, Wellington 6011
PO Box 10 747 Wellington 6140
+64 4 471 1054
Auckland
Generator, Level 12, 11 Britomart Place, Auckland CBD, Auckland 1010
PO Box 106 158, Auckland City, Auckland 1143
+64 9 282 4771
TwentyTwo Independent Property Advisers Limited is licenced under the Real Estate Agents Act 2008.
